|
|
|

Taxes - The Heritage FoundationTaxes - The Heritage Foundation The death tax: What does it kill? Who does it affect? It affects hundreds of thousands of small-business owners across the country—as well as their employees and community residents who benefit from the senior and day care centers, playgrounds, charities, and learning centers that are built or supported by small-business owners. Like water and sunlight in an ecosystem, small businesses provide sustenance essential to building and preserving communities. So high is the death tax that a large portion of heirs to small companies cannot afford to pay it after the business founder dies, and see themselves forced to sell to giant corporations—which have no personal ties to the communities of their new acquisitions, and thus no incentive to commit to local institutions. What does the death tax kill? The best of American life and civil society itself. The death tax is simply antithetical to the core of the American dream. View Article - Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:53:00 -0400 Senator Jim DeMint cites Heritage research in his speech on preventing the renewal of the death tax. View Article - Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 2010 is the only year since 1916 in which heirs to an estate will not have to pay the dreaded death tax. Victory for small businesses? Not yet—due to a legal quirk, the death tax is scheduled to come back to life in 2011. Studies, statistics, and real life have shown again and again that the businesses and families burdened with the death tax often see themselves forced to cut back on benefits, investments, and employees. The death tax keeps new jobs from being created, hurting not just the affected businesses, but the economy as a whole. Because it is a tax on capital, the death tax destroys as many as 1.5 million jobs that the economy needs as it struggles to recover. Heritage Foundation tax policy expert Curtis Dubay details a replacement for the death tax, and explains why Congress must kill the death tax—now. View Article - Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:09:00 -0400 The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act would likely lead to the same conditions that caused the housing bubble of a few years ago. View Article - Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:00:00 -0400 Curtis Dubay discusses the expiration of the death tax and the threat of its return. View Article - Mon, 19 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 Brian Riedl discusses the federal budget and the Bush tax cuts. View Article - Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 President Obama and congressional Democrats are blaming their trillion-dollar budget deficits on the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003. Letting these tax cuts expire is their answer. Yet the data flatly contradict this "tax cuts caused the deficits" narrative. Consider the three most persistent myths: View Article - Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 Brian Riedl discusses the expiration of the Bush tax cuts and other budget issues. View Article - Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 Professional sports leagues have ways of ensuring that “the last shall be first.” Teams with bad regular-season records get the top draft choices, theoretically allowing them to bring in the best young talent. Teams with excellent records draft later. View Article - Thu, 08 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 At approximately 8:30 a.m. on the first Friday of every month, the Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics releases a snapshot showing what the U.S. labor market looked like in the previous month. The report usually runs more than 30 pages, and is filled with (generally obscure) statistics, tables, and charts. But the highlight of each month's report is a single figure that circulates quickly through the press, and is taken immediately to be an important indicator of the general health of the economy: the unemployment rate. View Article - Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 It would come via a piece of legislation called the "Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act." Attached, ridiculously enough, to a spending bill that provides war funding for the troops, it will soon hit the House floor for a vote. View Article - Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:00:00 -0400 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, will have grave effects on families, including higher taxes, less choice in health care plans, and potential loss of coverage. The result will be millions still without coverage and increased government dependency. View Article - Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:49:00 -0400 America has repealed large health care bills before, and repeal of Obamacare is certainly possible now. View Article - Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:41:00 -0400 The recent passage of Obamacare poses grave effects on small businesses and doctors. View Article - Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:00:00 -0400 Senator Jim DeMint cites Heritage research on tax breaks and job creation in Senate debate. View Article - Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:00:00 -0400 The annual federal budget deficit is projected to reach 8.3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2020—more than three times the historical average of 2.3 percent. This dramatic increase in the federal deficit will be exclusively the result of increasing spending, not declining revenues (or the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts). Rapid growth in Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid costs and interest payments on the national debt will cause virtually all of this new spending. Any sustainable fix must therefore address the source of the problem—rapidly rising entitlement spending. View Article - Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:38:00 -0400 JD Foster discusses a proposed millionaire tax. View Article - Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:00:00 -0400 The deficit will reach a stunning $1.5 trillion this year, and it is obvious that spending is the problem. In fact, raising taxes to pay for the increase in spending would have harmful effects on the economy. View Article - Fri, 18 Jun 2010 01:00:00 -0400 President Obama uttered that unpresidential phrase last week. He needs to stop the threats, take a deep breath and calm down—especially when reacting to criticism by the press and the American public. That’s part of what you get when you’re elected President of the United States. Many Americans were shocked that this President would, yet again, pass the buck and blame others for problems in the gulf. View Article - Mon, 14 Jun 2010 01:00:00 -0400 Curtis Dubay discusses the venture capital tax and other proposed taxes. View Article - Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:00:00 -0400
|
|
|
Looking for more great sites?
|
|
May I suggest the following....
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net Neutrality and the FCC |
|
|
|
Sunday, October 25, 2009 www.meatandpotatoes.org |
|
|
The internet is a rather complex thing to grasp, something most of us simply take for granted. I liken our collective use of internet to a teenager being introduced to the magic of driving. We all remember those awkward “Dial-Up” days of driver’s education. Everything was new, and we were required to learn new tasks like periled parking that today seem simple. Together we all got used to putting 3 w’s in front of everything, a .com at the end and using that strange symbol over the 2 on the keyboard to send an email.
Everyone here remembers that exciting day when we were handed the keys to freedom and like that first victory lap in the family roadster, we plugged into a broadband high speed internet connection, and the whole world changed. In the time sense then we have cruised down the road, with not a care in the world for how this thing even works. It wasn’t till the first time the breaks failed, or we didn’t have a seatbelt on that we came to realize the knowing a bit about how a car woks is important. So to is the internet we all share today. If we do not pay attention to the car, the mechanic, or the road bad things will happen. Ironically our Federal Government is looking at the worlds last privately owned national network, and claiming it like the highway system is there’s to gain control of and own.
Up till now the FCC has plaid a minimal roll in regulation of the telecommunications companies that have invested billions of privet money into today’s network. Many of the rules that guide the day to day functioning and activity of our nations broadband network, has been settled by the courts, as with any healthy industry. I say healthy, because unlike banks, auto manufactures, and major retailers this industry still has both good profits, and a robust pool of investment cash for witch to grow and improve with.
This spring’s Stimulus package included the allocation of funds to expand our broadband network to rural areas where only dial-up is still available. While over $7.8 Billion dollars have been put on the table to expand broadband internet access the largest providers of services including AT&T, Verizon and Comcast have not taken the money to expand infrastructure from the federal government. The funding was available with a major string attached, government regulation including new “Net Neutrality” laws that would prevent traffic management on their networks and diminishing network speeds globally.
Now 3 months later, since the industry would not come to the regulatory table willingly, the industry is being (in the words of Bill Marh) “Dragged to it”. On Thursday H.R. 3458 was introduced in the House of Representatives, and referred to Energy and Commerce Committee. This is not the first time, Congressman Markey (of Crap and Trade fame) has introduced such legislation, but it has died each time in committee. In fact this is the third time, so what’s different?
 |
|
Diversity Czar Mark Lloyd |
"In Venezuela, with Chavez, is really an incredible revolution - a democratic revolution. To begin to put in place things that are going to have an impact on the people of Venezuela.
"The property owners and the folks who then controlled the media in Venezuela rebelled - worked, frankly, with folks here in the U.S. government - worked to oust him. But he came back with another revolution, and then Chavez began to take very seriously the media in his country." | | First off, President Obama is in the House! Then there is that “Majority” thing that is working out so well with Healthcare. Then there is that quiet appointment of the FCC’s Diversity Czar Mark Lloyd, who is already shaking things up with his public comments about admiring Hugo Chavez and his “Incredible Revolution” that worked out so well after he took over the majority of TV and Radio in his county to eliminate negative press. In the names of “Diversity” and “Discrimination” he is leading the charge for government control of the air waves in the U.S. with Covez as his idol. That brings me to the other thing that has changed in Mackey’s latest bill.
New words: The term “Diversity” was never there, now it is. “Discrimination” appears 9 times, and so dose the term “Lawful Content”.
Also a new ability for customers to lodge complaints to the FCC against an ISP, should all content not be available at the same speed for the same price. Violators will face swift and heavy fines, and the fines will be awarded to the person filing the complaint. Imagine a liberal bog, or millions of them are receiving money for a complaint, and then watching the bandwidth of your Rush Limbaugh podcast or Streaming audio of WHLO being reduced to the point were it will barley function. And imagine this happening while one by one the stations we all listen to are pulled of the air one by one in the name of diversity. Imagine to the amazing redistribution of wealth as these profitable companies are sucked dry by armies of complainers who get paid for every ruling in their favor.
Sure it sounds absurd, but I’m not coming up with this just from the language in the bill. I’ve read hundreds of pages of FCC reports praising Government ownership of these networks. None of them mentioned China or Iran, and I think we all know why. I’ve also looked to what Mark Lloyd himself wrote in a 2008 article titled “Net Neutrality Is a Civil Rights Issue”
“Communities of color and other under-represented groups have long fought for a more diverse and inclusive media system. Discrimination and segregation prevented people of color from obtaining radio or TV licenses when these mediums were first created. During the 1970s, cable promised to be a real alternative to TV for communities of color seeking diverse programming; it didn't happen. Yet, many of these very same companies now want to prevent Internet users, including people of color, from accessing diverse online content of their choice.”
 |
|
Diversity Czar Mark Lloyd |
| "We're in a position where you have to say who is going to step down so someone else can have power." | | Lloyd’s misleading and completely false application of “Diversity” and “Discrimination” is simply a means that justify the end game of Government seizure of privet property, Collapsing of a privet industry, and Control over internet content just as he wishes to do to talk radio. Community organizations all over the country smell the opportunity to profit off this transition, and are coming out of the woodwork to rally behind this new application of Net Neutrality in the most devious of ways. Hundreds of pro Net Neutrality web sites have popped up all over, backed by large organizations like ACORN and SEIU, and thousands of smaller organizations to give the illusion that the public as a whole is behind this bill. The day before the legislation was introduced the Chairman of the FCC recived a letter from 40 such groups. The language used is chilling:
“These network neutrality rules are needed for people of color and low income individuals to be creators of Internet content that is relevant to their communities, not just consumers of content that is profitable for big cable and phone companies.”
“the signers of this letter would like nothing more than for our communities to earn the title of “bandwidth hogs.” …using the Internet to create and distribute content that allows us to control our own image”
“It is already a challenge for people of color and low income to gain access to capital to start or advance their own businesses. We see the Internet as an opportunity to level the economic playing field”
“Similarly, without government intervention requiring non-discrimination rules in housing, credit and banking…where would people of color and low income be today?
“The decisions made by the FCC will determine whether our communications system can be used by champions of civil rights to advance economic equality, democratic participation, and self-determination for people that have long been disadvantaged and discriminated against.”
This is the same game we have seen plaid over and over again by this administration with the help of his “Community Organizers”. Many for these groups are part of the Apollo Alliance who openly admit and brag about writing the Stimulus bill that was shoved down our thoughts back in the spring. Many were involved in Cap and trade which looms on the horizon, after passing the House this summer. Many have played a key roll in National Heathcare in the face of the majority of the American people rejecting it completely. This bill however is far more sinister if it is played out to its ultimate goal. This goal is far worse then the billions of dollars that will be stolen and redistributed to people with no legitimate right to it. Far worse then the acquisition of massive power to be wielded by the Federal Government, and to propaganda machine it will create. The chilling effect on the last best venue for our freedom of speech will be ripped from us never to return.
 |
“No government ever voluntarily reduces it’s self in size. Government programs, once lunched never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on Earth.” | In thinking of Net Neutrality and the massive expansion of the FCC, along with expansion of our Federal Government, thanks to the afore mentioned legislation in the last year, I keep hearing the words of President Ronald Reagan. I leave you with his wisdom:
Read H.R. 3458
|
|
| |
|
|
|

|
| 1 - There is no liberal bias in the media |
|
| 2 - Separation of Church and State |
|
| 3 - Banning partial birth abortions is an assault on a woman's right to choose |
|
| 4 - The Outsourcing of American Jobs |
|
| 5 - The Creation of Green Jobs |
|
| 6 - Same Sex Marriage |
|
| 7 - Rasing Taxes Equals more government funds |
|
| 8 - The Supreme Court should keep International Courts in mind |
|
| 9 - America must be humble to the international community |
|
| 10 - Government Knows Best |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My Top Blog Picks:
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
We are an independent group of thinkers, who are neither Democrats nor Republicans, but believe in right and wrong. It’s time to clear all the crazy stuff from our lives, and get down to just the Meat and Potatoes of today’s issues. Join us, and invite your friends to sit down at your table and discuss with us. Site Map | |
| |
|